|
|
|
|
|
printable version
 |
|
|
|
FOCUS ON SAFETY
Dollars and
Sense:
The Benefits of Safety on the Bottom Line
By Joe Quigg
Vice President, Engineering |
|
|
|
 |
|
To remain competitive and profitable,
manufacturers across industry sectors are restructuring
operations in order to cut costs and improve operational
efficiency. This is felt at all levels of manufacturing,
including highly sensitive areas such as those
controlled by plant floor safety systems. While cost
definitely needs to be a consideration, safety must be
viewed outside the realm of pure cost burden. Instead,
adding safety systems can potentially lead to more
productive equipment and reduced costs due to fewer
workers? compensation claims, less overtime, and more
efficient use of management's time. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why Are
Manufacturers Holding Back?
Despite the
many potential benefits safety control provides, it has commonly
been viewed as an unnecessary and expensive barrier to increasing
production. Traditionally, safety and productivity in a
manufacturing plant are pulled in opposite directions. The safer a
system was, the less productive it was. Additionally, manufacturers
struggle to cost justify the implementation of a safety system.
That's because, beyond compliance, many benefits often go
unrealized, such as lower insurance premiums, making manufacturers
hesitant to invest in a safety system. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workers'
Compensation
Clearly, the
safety of employees is a priority at manufacturing plants. In
addition to the safety of employees, a well-designed safety system
can also potentially save a company money. For example, workers'
compensation is one of the more costly elements associated with
safety. Nearly all states require an employer to procure workers'
compensation insurance from the state workers compensation
department or an insurance company. The financial impact of employee
injuries is measurable, so claims and insurance premiums associated
with them are considered a direct loss. Obviously, reducing the
frequency and severity of employee claims will potentially help
minimize these premiums. Indirect costs, on the other hand, include
production losses, increased overtime, and unproductive use of
management's time. These are indirect costs because their financial
and operational impacts are more difficult to measure, and it's
tempting to minimize the impact of these costs. However, a 2001
survey from insurance company Liberty Mutual revealed that these
indirect costs are potentially three to five times the size of
direct costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase
Production
The
historical view of safety was that it slowed production, so
implementing an appropriate safety solution could potentially
increase production. Companies implementing safety systems can
increase throughput and, at the same time, instill greater
confidence among workers that the company is taking their safety and
well-being seriously. This can help boost employee morale, which can
lead to further gains in productivity. One of the automotive
manufacturers was actually able to produce one additional vehicle
every five hours at each assembly plant after implementing a safety
solution.
An example of
how advanced safety products can improve productivity involves light
curtains, or infrared beams, that detect operator presence in
hazardous zones. Typically, a safety interlock gate is used to help
prevent operators from entering these areas. A gate takes about 10
seconds to open and 10 seconds to close, depending on the
programming. If operators do this 100 times a day, 6 days a week,
300 days a year, the amount of lost productivity adds up. By
replacing traditional gates with light curtains, operators -- when
entering hazardous zones -- would simply break the infrared beam and
the operation would come to a safe stop (with the appropriate
programming). Due to the frequency with which this area was entered,
the light curtain investment would quickly increase productivity and
create a positive return. International Automation has seen this
improved productivity first-hand. They retrofit stamping machines
for large tandem lines, and they're working on upgrading the safety
control for five presses that were 40 percent efficient and produced
between 85 and 120 parts per hour. International Automation switched
to the Allen-Bradley®
GuardLogix™,
a new safety controller from
Rockwell Automation®, and saw the tandem lines efficiency rise to
90 percent, with each tandem producing an average of 500 parts each
hour. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
Cost Savings
Safety
systems can potentially pay significant dividends by helping
companies comply with regulatory requirements. For example, a visit
from safety inspectors can result in the immediate shutdown of any
machine considered to be unsafe. This type of interruption on a
production line could have potential financial consequences, such as
lost production, but may also result in penalties incurred from
safety violations. In addition to increasing productivity,
implementing a safety system can potentially reduce costs in other
areas such as overtime, management, and public relations expenses.
Overtime issues can arise when an employee is injured and additional
time from other employees is required to make up for lost
production. Safety systems can also help managers and supervisors
use their time more wisely. For example, when an employee is
injured, management is required to spend additional time
investigating and managing the claims. When an accident occurs or a
fine is issued, a company's public relations efforts (and costs)
will potentially increase in order to effectively manage the
reputation of the company. By investing in the appropriate safety
technology, companies can safeguard their most valuable asset the
workforce and at the same time, reduce costs, improve morale, and
help ensure continuity of future production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excerpt from Rockwell
Automation Inc. Publication: |
|
|
|
SAFETY-SP006A-EN-P - July 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|